who can still make it even faster?
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Dec 4 2021
Dec 1 2021
Nov 30 2021
Nov 28 2021
Nov 22 2021
Nov 21 2021
Nov 14 2021
Nov 2 2021
Oct 31 2021
Oct 30 2021
Pan/zoom references:
Oct 28 2021
bertl mentioned that the bayer order should not be affected by different crops
Oct 25 2021
initial work done by @_BAndiT1983_ but an issue remains where the thread is not really killed on stopping
Oct 24 2021
Oct 15 2021
Oct 4 2021
Unless there are actual usecases for a VPN something simpler like a pure terminal sharing solution seems better for support purposes to me.
Sep 30 2021
Sep 27 2021
Sep 26 2021
May 27 2021
Mar 28 2021
Is this the page to discuss this project or is it being discussed on the mailing list as well. For some reason when I try to access the Archives of the mailing list I cannot access them. Also, my understanding of the project based on last GSOC is that the Packet layer is mostly done, it is the layers below that have to be optimized?
Feb 20 2021
Feb 18 2021
Maybe Co-Simulation with the gateware simulated in cxxrtl / verilator with qemu would be an interesting approach here
Dec 28 2020
Experimental gateware provided but behaviour requires some debugging with logic analyser.
Dec 27 2020
In T734#17428, @BAndiT1983 wrote:@eppisai Was trying to answer your questions on IRC, but you weren't online. There is little reason to place a cartesian plane in the painter, as the purposes are different, it's more or less about "single responsibility". It would be better to create a base class for the graph widgets, e.g. BaseGraph, and then derive different graphs from it.
@eppisai Was trying to answer your questions on IRC, but you weren't online. There is little reason to place a cartesian plane in the painter, as the purposes are different, it's more or less about "single responsibility". It would be better to create a base class for the graph widgets, e.g. BaseGraph, and then derive different graphs from it.
Dec 21 2020
Dec 2 2020
Issue has been identified and a fix is available, now the next task is how to detect and fix the behaviour with the right hardware version in the upstream version: https://github.com/apertus-open-source-cinema/axiom-firmware/issues/179
Jun 8 2020
I have tested the commands and they work for me. So I'm closing this task.
@sebastian I have edited the page for this task, please have a look.
May 25 2020
Sergio tested the new Firmware 2.0 with this file
https://github.com/apertus-open-source-cinema/axiom-firmware/blob/master/software/scripts/pic_jtag_pcie.py#L20
modified to
base = 0x10
and reports the HDMI works OK!
May 24 2020
May 20 2020
many thanks @alex !
May 14 2020
Apr 1 2020
please elaborate on the "colored" monochrome output mode, not clear for me yet.
Mar 30 2020
Mar 25 2020
Mar 22 2020
new firmware has been built, testing if the fix is working there as well is still to be done.
pip install --force "pypng==0.0.18"
Mar 16 2020
Mar 12 2020
Ohh sorry my bad, Didn't considered 2nd condition.
Thank you for the explanation.
What output do you get?
hey Sebastian,
I am not getting desired output by running 2nd command. Is there some typo ?
Because on switching the last two images in the sequence. i.e -swap 1,2 gives correct output.
Mar 11 2020
Perfect, tested and verified! Thanks!
Will update wiki now.
This should avoid the sample point setting:
Works, many thanks!
Thanks Bertl for the direction.