GET parameter is id matching the JSON file

https://icon-library.com/icon/permalink-icon-12.html

@BAndiT1983 did it

Do you work with a camera target object currently? If yes you could simply prevent that from going below 0

great!

We can use same JSON approach which was described for the camera position, as ID we can use the one we set in our parts JSON.

1. Yes, just adjust in index.html
2. Yes, favicon.ico is the one, just replace existing file

Rotation is restricted, but panning needs additional research.

Already implemented, it works when parts are switched, but needs a small fix when the page re-/loads

Sounds good!

Maybe we can encode JSON with base64 in URL query params:

we went with option 3

Love the new material parameters with SSR @BAndiT1983 !

Preview of vue.js version, list is working and switching also:

I will create an orientation cube in blender.

The "flip" button option is cool and solves everything mentioned here! Nice!

Update & new notes:

fix applied and seems to work ok so far.

(21:13:14) RexOrCine: Someone please check 2. Technical - https://wiki.apertus.org/index.php/AXIOM_Beta
(21:13:44) RexOrCine: ... and see if the link to 'Parts' works, and if not perhaps come up with some idea why.
(21:13:56) RexOrCine: why not*
(21:14:15) RexOrCine: Because it absolutely does my head in across multiple devices.
(21:18:22) se6ast1an: I suspect the "fix" for the anchor offset applied recently has this side effect that headers now "cover" links above them
(21:18:27) se6ast1an: BAndiT1983: can you confirm?
(21:21:12) se6ast1an: https://lab.apertus.org/T1160
(21:26:47) RexOrCine: I can provide another example. See 1.2.5 - https://wiki.apertus.org/index.php/10-Enclosures_and_Associated_Mechanical_Parts#Compact_Enclosure_Shell
(21:27:02) RexOrCine: ... and underneath there's 'Full size image' - that also doesn't work.

Proposal for a fix:

the fix has lead to headers covering links right above them from being clicked.

fixed in firefox when page does not need to be reloaded at least.

Blend4Web is mostly dead at the moment and forum riddled with spam. Another alternative is Armory3D and Godot Engine.

Tests with blend4web were conducted and created very nice looking results but the process requires an import and export through blender every time and manual upload of a resulting html file so that proved to be not too handy.

They can even connect with users on other platforms, if -- like the microblogging service Mastodon -- they implement the same free protocols Aardwolf is built on.

if we use an image (png, svg, etc.) then the thing is indeed solved but it means we cannot change the text.

If we used an svg instead would this be a way to work around that?

The challenge is not the CSS or colors but getting mediawiki to create a link for the whole button, not just the text (which does not work yet)

Good lad.

See https://wiki.apertus.org/index.php/Sandbox#Info_Area

progress but no success yet...
https://wiki.apertus.org/index.php/Sandbox#Buttons

moved css to other theme file, now it seems to be applied.

css applied

[15:44] (BAndiT1983) RexOrCine, this issue should solve the struggle with images at least a bit -> https://github.com/borkweb/bootstrap-mediawiki/issues/49

Thanks. I'll fix the rest.

Right I see the problem now.

Nah. The images are meant to be full body width. There's a problem somewhere.

I thought you said it was the rooster that sounded the alarm to the villagers that the pancake had gone rogue. I love it how you're making out that you're not familiar with the story now.

Is that chicken going in the pancake or is that mr. hankey in the image "the pancake"?

Sebastian wanted it to look like a Ladybird book (namely 'The Big Pancake', which he likes), I wanted it to look like the Bible (still the most popular book in the world after the Harry Potter and the Fantastic Boasts series).

The new article style has been a compromise between me (wanting bigger font size) and Rex (wanting smaller font size) so in the end we settled with medium font size which we are using now.

Is this not a duplicate of T1110 ?