Is this the page to discuss this project or is it being discussed on the mailing list as well. For some reason when I try to access the Archives of the mailing list I cannot access them. Also, my understanding of the project based on last GSOC is that the Packet layer is mostly done, it is the layers below that have to be optimized?
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Mar 29 2021
Mar 28 2021
Feb 21 2021
Feb 20 2021
Feb 18 2021
Dec 21 2020
Next tests:
- Evaluate the OLPF distance from sensor. 1mm, 4mm, 10mm
- This requires a consistent camera setup otherwise there's too much variation with lighting/chart quality/etc
Dec 2 2020
Dec 1 2020
Nov 18 2020
Removed from the library and updated the Eagle files.
The µZ is a left-over and has been on the silkscreen for a long time without any problems (as it is outside the border), but I can see how it will cause problems here so I will remove it from the Eagle files.
There is a "µZ" symbol in the corner of the interface board silkscreen thats not supposed to be there I assume.
Nov 17 2020
Nov 15 2020
Oct 16 2020
reference pnp file:
All done, hurray!
Sep 28 2020
New issues to resolve:
Jul 31 2020
Excellent job @BAndiT1983 , I think for now all open subtasks have been completed!
Jul 24 2020
Jul 12 2020
Tried several Gerber viewers (gerbv, Kicad and some other tools), so the problem is varying from tool to tool a bit, probably related to the format 2 of the data. Will try to adjust the header of drill layer manually and check if it helps.
Jul 11 2020
Jul 5 2020
Jul 2 2020
new repo has been created and we started filling it: https://github.com/apertus-open-source-cinema/pcb-paneliser
The laser cutter couldnt cut the rubber so Bertl will now try the other laser.
Jun 21 2020
Jun 8 2020
May 31 2020
May 30 2020
May 23 2020
Small rubber feet have been designed to be laser cut.
May 19 2020
May 14 2020
May 12 2020
Example gerber package sent to PCB manufacturer (single PCB, no panel).
May 11 2020
This was supplied as output by manual panellization in altium
Apr 19 2020
clean up
Mar 30 2020
Mar 25 2020
Mar 16 2020
Feb 25 2020
Feb 22 2020
Jan 28 2020
Nov 28 2019
Shimming if often used in PL lenses that have a scale for focusing. This scale is calibrated with a target like a Siemens Star or a Test Sheet.
Companies like P+S Technik do this with a rig where you mount the lenses and you can measure the focusing distance from the sensor to the target.
Once this scale is engraved cannot be changed as far as i now and that's why people shim the mounts.
Other cameras have "back focusing" that moves the sensor back and forth.
Photography lenses don't have this scales so they don't need shimming unless you want to change the range of focus to allow the lens focus more at macro or at infinity.
I think it's the correct solution to have the possibility to shim the mount, because otherwise you may need to move the sensor or try other more complicated ways to move and align the lens.